In a response to a question from the European Parliament Commissioner Šefčovič confirmed that the European Commission is set up to support ODF in external communication for documents if they are open for revision. The ODF standard can be used as well as the OOXML standard.
See the full response on the website of the European Parliament.
Tuesday, 14 January 2014
Thursday, 2 January 2014
EU Rolling Plan on ICT Standardisation
First of all, Happy New Year to you all
– above all good health, success and lots of luck.
For ICT standardisation in Europe the
New Year starts with great news. Just before Christmas the European
Commission published the EU Rolling Plan on ICT Standardisation. This
is a work programme focussing on how ICT standards and specifications
can support EU policies across all different Commission Directorates.
For the first time such a concise
document is available providing advice to the Commission Services on
the availability of standards and specifications, including global
ICT specifications, and providing a plan for ICT standards bodies of
how policy making in Europe can be supported by standardisation. It
also provides a high level of transparency to all stakeholders and to
the public. This Rolling Plan has the potential to further drive the
use and implementation of standards and specifications in policy
contexts in Europe – and it may shine beyond the borders of the EU.
The Rolling Plan is part of what had been introduced with
Regulation 1025/2012. It was developed by the European Commission in
close collaboration with the EU ICT Multi-Stakeholder Platform with
the involvement of the Member States, Industry, European and global
standards bodies, societal stakeholders. It therefore reflects a
broad consensus on needs and opportunities for standardisation. And
it is a great result – amongst others – of the productive and
forward-looking work of the ICT Multi-Stakeholder Platform.
The Rolling Plan is available for download from the Commission website. It consists of two introductory
chapters outlining the strategic thinking behind the Rolling Plan and
the opportunities for implementation of standards. The major part of
the Rolling Plan is chapter 3 which looks at standardisation in the
context of the policy priorities identified by the European
Commission. Finally, a chapter 4 also highlights horizontal standards
and specifications that are of relevance across many ICT
implementations.
Congratulations to the European
Commission for developing this Rolling Plan and creating such a
valuable level of planning around ICT standardisation in the context
of EU policy making.
Friday, 15 November 2013
Thursday, 14 November 2013
Fresh thinking for Cloud technologies - the Open Cloud Declaration
Good news for all those who are looking for guidance on Cloud technologies... Under OpenForum Europe's leadership a number of stakeholders in Cloud technologies and services have developed the Open Cloud Declaration. It addresses the full spectrum of what is needed for successful and trusted Cloud computing services.
Special focus is on openness and an open, competitive market for Cloud technologies in order to avoid lock-in and dependency on a single or specific group of providers. In general, the Declaration is a major contribution for forward looking actions regarding the adoption of Cloud technologies and the commitment of market players to drive Cloud technologies as the major computing paradigm of the future.
Special focus is on openness and an open, competitive market for Cloud technologies in order to avoid lock-in and dependency on a single or specific group of providers. In general, the Declaration is a major contribution for forward looking actions regarding the adoption of Cloud technologies and the commitment of market players to drive Cloud technologies as the major computing paradigm of the future.
Friday, 12 July 2013
European Commission guide to better practices in public procurement of ICT technologies
The week before last the EuropeanCommission issued a Communication “Against lock-in: building open
ICT systems by making better use of standards in public procurement”.
(COM(2013) 455 - together with SWD(2013) 224). This results from
Digital Agenda Action Item 23. The objective is to provide guidance
on ICT procurement for better procurement by putting more stress on
standards and achieving more openness with open ICT infrastructures
in public administrations. And this Communication complements a
number of other Commission initiatives and guides, above all the
European Interoperability Framework. But it also refers to how the
new EU Regulation on Standardisation (1025/2012) can help to make use of
best-of-breed global ICT standards.
I could be very brief by saying the
guide is extremely good. Please read it – it's available on the
Commission web site. And public authorities: please make use of it.
The open way which is standards based is the better way for
increasing choice, flexibility and allowing the uptake of innovative
new technologies.
The Communication was presented alongwith the statement that the use of “Open standards would save
public sector €1 billion a year”. Personally, I am always
cautious with such savings statements. But for sure: Open Standards
are a way to achieve cost effectiveness, reduce exit costs for
technologies and stifle competition and enable greater choice.
The key aspect, to avoid lock-in, is in
the focus of the documents:
“Using ICT systems based on standards instead of proprietary technology will help to open up restrictive public procurement practices, because standards make essential knowledge about a system available to anyone, implying that other potential suppliers could maintain or evolve the system under more competitive terms and conditions.” (Communication, p. 4)
The Guide, published as a Staff Working
Document (SWD), is composed to give practical advice on how to
proceed for analysis in decision making when taking procurement
decisions around ICT. It is clearly structured – and I would add
worth reading and inspiring also for non-procurers. It covers the
different steps from strategy building to long term budgetary
planning. All in all a comprehensive approach with high practical
relevance.
The benefits of standards is a key
aspect addressed. Or better: procurers are guided towards putting a
strong focus on standards, building expertise around standards and
standardisation and how to assess what is required to meet their
needs. And the Guide is not shy in clearly stating that “FRAND
licenses create barriers for Open Source projects to implement the
technical specification” (Guide, p. 12), which needs to be considered in the
context of software interoperability standards.
All in all two very good and useful
documents from the Commission. Some people in their reactions over
the last two weeks criticised that the Commission is not going far
enough. E.g. that practical interoperability is hampered because the
Commission does not act accordingly, e.g. when it comes to document
formats. While this may be correct, it is more an issue of the
implementation of the Guide than of the Guide as such. And this is
also my wish: that the Guide may be promoted and find many followers
in public procurement. Following the Guide will promote
interoperability and will push the implementation of open ICT
ecosystems – with all benefits regarding freedom of choice,
encouraging competition and innovation, and driving the uptake of new
ICT technologies in the European public sector.
Monday, 17 June 2013
G8 oder G9 - quo vadis Baden-Württemberg?
Vor ein paar Wochen gab es schon mal Zwist in der Grün-Roten Koalition in Baden-Württemberg wegen G9, d.h. insbesondere zofften sich wohl die beiden Franktionsvorsitzenden/innen darüber. Klarer Standpunkt des SPD Franktionsvorsitzenden Schmiedel: Die SPD will mehr Schulen ermöglichen, zu G9 zurück zu kehren, als es im Koalitionsvertrag vor einigen Jahren festgeschrieben wurde. Und die SPD ist auch willens, dies zum Wahlkampfthema zu machen. Zu meiner Überraschung die Position der Grünen, z.B. vertreten von der Fraktionsvorsitzenden Sitzmann: keine Erhöhung der Zahl der Schulen, die G9 wieder einführen dürfen; statt dessen Förderung von Gemeinschaftsschulen und Verbesserungen an G8. In den vergangenen Wochen wurde diese Position seitens der baden-württembergischen Grünen immer wieder bestätigt.
Nun, ich bin ein bekennender Anhänger von G9 - 13 Jahre bis zum Abitur. In einer Welt, in der Bildung und Wissen unser größtes Kapital ist, können wir die 13 Jahre, können wir G9 gut gebrauchen. In G8 wurde schulisches Lernen auf Wissensvermittlung reduziert. Es bleibt einfach kein Platz für echte Bildung, für die Ausgestaltung einer Schule als Mikrokosmos, als Polis, in der nicht nur Wissensblock and Wissensblock gehängt, sondern in der verantwortungsvolle, junge Menschen auf das Leben vorbereitet werden.
Die Grünen wollen offenbar all jene, die nicht gleich auf's G8 gehen oder die sich mit G8 nicht wohlfühlen, in die beruflichen Gymnasien oder in die Gemeinschaftsschule drängen. Das ist Separatismus und konterkariert Durchlässigkeit und Chancengleichheit. Netto heißt das zum Beispiel: Wer heute als Kind nach Klasse 4 nicht gleich ein G8 Gymnasium besucht, kann es nur mit der Überwindung von Hürden zur allgemeinen Hochschulreife bringen. Spätentwickler, Kinder aus bildungsfernen Schichten, deren Eltern sich nicht trauen, ihre Kleinen gleich aufs Gymnasium zu schikcne, sind hier am Ende die Verlierer.
Mir ist die Haltung der Grünen hier nicht klar. Erstaunlich bis Enttäuschend. Ich hätte von der Grün-Roten Landesregierung gerade in der Schul- und Bildungspolitik ein paar Impulse erwartet - Baden-Württemberg bietet ein solides Fundament, auf dem eine innovative Schul- und Bildungspolitik aufbauen könnte. Das bremsen die Grünen aus mir nicht nachvollziehbaren Gründen gerade aus. Schade eigentlich ....
Nun, ich bin ein bekennender Anhänger von G9 - 13 Jahre bis zum Abitur. In einer Welt, in der Bildung und Wissen unser größtes Kapital ist, können wir die 13 Jahre, können wir G9 gut gebrauchen. In G8 wurde schulisches Lernen auf Wissensvermittlung reduziert. Es bleibt einfach kein Platz für echte Bildung, für die Ausgestaltung einer Schule als Mikrokosmos, als Polis, in der nicht nur Wissensblock and Wissensblock gehängt, sondern in der verantwortungsvolle, junge Menschen auf das Leben vorbereitet werden.
Die Grünen wollen offenbar all jene, die nicht gleich auf's G8 gehen oder die sich mit G8 nicht wohlfühlen, in die beruflichen Gymnasien oder in die Gemeinschaftsschule drängen. Das ist Separatismus und konterkariert Durchlässigkeit und Chancengleichheit. Netto heißt das zum Beispiel: Wer heute als Kind nach Klasse 4 nicht gleich ein G8 Gymnasium besucht, kann es nur mit der Überwindung von Hürden zur allgemeinen Hochschulreife bringen. Spätentwickler, Kinder aus bildungsfernen Schichten, deren Eltern sich nicht trauen, ihre Kleinen gleich aufs Gymnasium zu schikcne, sind hier am Ende die Verlierer.
Mir ist die Haltung der Grünen hier nicht klar. Erstaunlich bis Enttäuschend. Ich hätte von der Grün-Roten Landesregierung gerade in der Schul- und Bildungspolitik ein paar Impulse erwartet - Baden-Württemberg bietet ein solides Fundament, auf dem eine innovative Schul- und Bildungspolitik aufbauen könnte. Das bremsen die Grünen aus mir nicht nachvollziehbaren Gründen gerade aus. Schade eigentlich ....
Wednesday, 15 May 2013
EuroCloud Germany – Conference 2013
There is probably no more agile and
informative promoter of using and profiting from Cloud technologies
in Europe than EuroCloud. EuroCloud cover the full spectrum from
creating awareness on the benefits of Cloud technologies to actual
requirements gathering for future innovation around the Cloud. In
this context, EuroCloud also actively contribute to the work done at
ETSI's for defining a Cloud standards map for Europe.
Yesterday I had the pleasure of being
invited at the EuroCloud Germany annual conference 2013. In my role
as co-facilitator of the ETSI standards mapping activity I was
invited to speak about Cloud standardisation and the Cloud Standards
Coordination. I tried to paint a picture of the Cloud standardisation
landscape with some special focus on the fact that a large number of
Cloud standards are already available and the actual task is to
identify them and prepare for combining them into Cloud solutions. I
stressed that standardisation Is going new ways in Cloud with
partnering and collaborating closely with customers, e.g. in the
Cloud Standards Customer Council, and in taking a community approach
for an open Cloud platform as done in the OpenStack Foundation. My
slides are available on silde share:
The programme of the conference was
extremely good with a number of high level speakers and excellent
presentations. Some of my take-aways are:
- Cloud technologies are not just a business for CTOs or CIOs in companies, they need to be addressed at the CEO and COO level.
- It is important to demonstrate to potential Cloud users the actual applications and solutions they can achieve by using the Cloud.
- Let's not talk Cloud technology more complex than it is – otherwise users will be frightened off.
- Trust and security are key aspects for Cloud users.
- Vendor lock-in will not help in achieving a broad uptake of Cloud technologies.
All in all really a great and
informative conference. Congratulations to the organisers.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
