And the author quotes Commissioner Kroes with a statement on lock-in made at an event last year:"Microsoft lock-in forces European Commission into Windows 7 upgrade talks
"Tuesday 05 April 2011 12:54
"The European Commission has been forced into extraordinary negotiations with Microsoft because it is locked in to using the vendor's software [...] "
"Commission vice-president Neelie Kroes cited vendor lock-in as one of the motives for the Digital Agenda when she was campaigning for it last year.
"'Many authorities have found themselves unintentionally locked in to proprietary technology for decades,' Kroes said in a speech in June 2010.
"'After a certain point, that original choice becomes so ingrained that alternatives risk being systematically ignored, no matter what the potential benefits. This is a waste of public money that most public bodies can no longer afford,' she said"
Read the full article online on ComputerWeekly.com. See also a previous post on this topic when NYT had addressed the same issue.
2 comments:
How come, an institution that has just liberated formerly closed and monopolised markets like e. g. the telecommunication market, now fosters the monopolisation of the office communication market? The telecommunication markets are nowadays regulated such that no competitor is allowed to dominate the market. Why does the same european commission foster the monopolisation of the office communication market where at a time of E-Government action plans and european interoperability strategies it should come to think about regulating this market?
Michael
Hey Michael, That's a very good point you are making. I very much like your analogy with the liberalisation, de-regulation and regulation in the telecom market. I agree that there could be many best practices to learn from regarding software interoperability in the IT market.
Post a Comment